<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Archives - Geothunder Main</title>
	<atom:link href="https://geothunder.com/category/science/energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://geothunder.com/category/science/energy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Before the Flood: A Carbon Tax Story</title>
		<link>https://geothunder.com/before-the-flood-carbon-tax-story/</link>
					<comments>https://geothunder.com/before-the-flood-carbon-tax-story/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geothunder.com/?p=1471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/before-the-flood-carbon-tax-story/">Before the Flood: A Carbon Tax Story</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="et_pb_section et_pb_section_0 et_section_regular" >
				
				
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_row et_pb_row_0">
				<div class="et_pb_column et_pb_column_4_4 et_pb_column_0  et_pb_css_mix_blend_mode_passthrough et-last-child">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_module et_pb_text et_pb_text_0  et_pb_text_align_left et_pb_bg_layout_light">
				
				
				
				
				<div class="et_pb_text_inner"><p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright wp-image-1475" src="http://geothunder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Before-the-Flood-Poster.jpg" alt="before-the-flood-poster The Real Cabon-Tax Story" height="506" width="337" srcset="https://geothunder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Before-the-Flood-Poster.jpg 646w, https://geothunder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Before-the-Flood-Poster-200x300.jpg 200w" sizes="(max-width: 337px) 100vw, 337px" />In recent years I have been quiet on energy related issues. We have come a long way in the last 10 years. Like many people I recently watched “Before the Flood.” most of the film was good, but I would like to post a word of warning about the carbon tax mentioned in the film. The idea of a carbon tax could work if it is not perverted by politics, but that scenario is unlikely.</p>
<p>I spent more than five years researching carbon capture and storage (CCS). There is a strong possibility that “carbon credits” will accompany a carbon tax. The result will likely be the rapid death of the coal industry, and an increase in the price of power. The death of the coal industry may leave many of you overjoyed, but carbon credits will act as a subsidy for some oil companies. CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) works well for getting oil out of the ground. Oil companies will get paid for offset credits while injecting CO2 into the ground to get more oil back. They want to inject CO2 anyway. Carbon Credits will make it profitable for them to source and sequester CO2.</p>
<p>Sounds good right?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember the exact numbers, but I believe the net result is carbon neutral at best. The oil coming out of the ground will offset any good that the carbon storage will do. Carbon credits are little more than a way to subsidize oil companies in a way that appears to be friendly to the environment.</p>
<p>Most of our research was in part paid by oil companies. They will benefit if carbon credits become common. The price of carbon credits will likely be dependent on a trade based system like the stock market.&nbsp; Such a system will cause significant fluctuation in other energy prices and energy intensive goods.</p>
<p>Companies like Denbury Resources even planned to use carbon credits as part of their business model. *Full disclosure I still have a small amount of Denbury stock, but I don&#8217;t expect to ever get my money back out of the company.*</p>
<p>A carbon tax sounds good on paper, but it is not a great solution to our carbon problem. The idea has flaws, and will be a new tool to abuse in the United States.</p></div>
			</div>
			</div>
				
				
				
				
			</div>
				
				
			</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/before-the-flood-carbon-tax-story/">Before the Flood: A Carbon Tax Story</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geothunder.com/before-the-flood-carbon-tax-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuous Resources Vs Traditional Oil Fields</title>
		<link>https://geothunder.com/continuous-resources-vs-traditional-oil-fields/</link>
					<comments>https://geothunder.com/continuous-resources-vs-traditional-oil-fields/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geothunder.com/?p=1023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Post 1 of several that will be used to answer questions regarding the shift in hubber&#8217;s peak post. This post tries to identify some of the differences between continuous resources and traditional resources in oil and gas fields. Currently, I would call it a draft. Please provide feedback on what you would like more information [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/continuous-resources-vs-traditional-oil-fields/">Continuous Resources Vs Traditional Oil Fields</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post 1 of several that will be used to answer questions regarding the shift in hubber&#8217;s peak post.</p>
<p>This post tries to identify some of the differences between continuous resources and traditional resources in oil and gas fields.</p>
<p>Currently, I would call it a draft. Please provide feedback on what you would like more information on.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/continuous-resources-vs-traditional-oil-fields/">Continuous Resources Vs Traditional Oil Fields</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geothunder.com/continuous-resources-vs-traditional-oil-fields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy Returned on Energy Invested for shales</title>
		<link>https://geothunder.com/energy-returned-on-energy-invested-for-shales/</link>
					<comments>https://geothunder.com/energy-returned-on-energy-invested-for-shales/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geothunder.com/?p=1013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>http://energy.geothunder.com/2011/10/11/eroei-shale-oil-and-shale-gas/  An answer to a question from the peak oil post that required more than a few lines.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/energy-returned-on-energy-invested-for-shales/">Energy Returned on Energy Invested for shales</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://energy.geothunder.com/2011/10/11/eroei-shale-oil-and-shale-gas/">http://energy.geothunder.com/2011/10/11/eroei-shale-oil-and-shale-gas/ </a></p>
<p>An answer to a question from the peak oil post that required more than a few lines.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/energy-returned-on-energy-invested-for-shales/">Energy Returned on Energy Invested for shales</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geothunder.com/energy-returned-on-energy-invested-for-shales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Energy Today: A shift of Hubbert’s Peak</title>
		<link>https://geothunder.com/thoughts-on-energy-today-a-shift-of-hubbert%e2%80%99s-peak/</link>
					<comments>https://geothunder.com/thoughts-on-energy-today-a-shift-of-hubbert%e2%80%99s-peak/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geothunder.com/?p=1010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This post analyzes recent energy development in North America, and  provides some evidence that Hubbert&#8217;s Peak may have significantly shifted into the future.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/thoughts-on-energy-today-a-shift-of-hubbert%e2%80%99s-peak/">Thoughts on Energy Today: A shift of Hubbert’s Peak</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://energy.geothunder.com/2011/10/02/shift-hubbert-peak/">This post analyzes recent energy development in North America, and  provides some evidence that Hubbert&#8217;s Peak may have significantly shifted into the future. </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/thoughts-on-energy-today-a-shift-of-hubbert%e2%80%99s-peak/">Thoughts on Energy Today: A shift of Hubbert’s Peak</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geothunder.com/thoughts-on-energy-today-a-shift-of-hubbert%e2%80%99s-peak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Energy sub site</title>
		<link>https://geothunder.com/energy-sub-site/</link>
					<comments>https://geothunder.com/energy-sub-site/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geothunder.com/?p=1007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Energy site is now active. Any new energy related posts will go there, but will be linked on this page.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/energy-sub-site/">Energy sub site</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://energy.geothunder.com">Energy site is now active.</a> Any new energy related posts will go there, but will be linked on this page.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://geothunder.com/energy-sub-site/">Energy sub site</a> appeared first on <a href="https://geothunder.com">Geothunder Main</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://geothunder.com/energy-sub-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
